<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/">

<channel rdf:about="https://slashdot.org/">
<title>Slashdot</title>
<link>https://slashdot.org/</link>
<description>News for nerds, stuff that matters</description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:rights>Copyright 1997-2016, SlashdotMedia. All Rights Reserved.</dc:rights>
<dc:date>2022-04-17T19:43:10+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:publisher>Dice</dc:publisher>
<dc:creator>help@slashdot.org</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Technology</dc:subject>
<syn:updateBase>1970-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
<syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
<syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://science.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/199203/film-maker-issues-1m-challenge-to-museum-to-repeat-radiocarbon-testing-of-the-shroud-of-turin?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://science.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/1753256/nasa-rolls-back-its-space-launch-system-mega-rocket?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://games.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0341201/activision-cooperating-with-federal-insider-trading-probes?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://news.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/238221/richard-stallman-calls-for-software-package-systems-that-help-maintain-your-freedoms?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://linux.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0229214/razers-first-linux-laptop-called-sexy---but-its-not-for-gamers?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://tech.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0140208/ukraine-opens-russian-drone-finds-duct-tape-and-canon-dslr-inside?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://tech.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0444211/is-windows-11-less-popular-than-windows-xp?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://science.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0426203/us-space-command-releases-decades-of-secret-military-data-confirms-interstellar-meteor-in-2014?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://it.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0030249/github-issues-security-alert-after-spotting-misuse-of-tokens-stolen-from-oauth-integrators?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://tech.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/0053230/social-media-made-us-stupid---and-how-to-fix-it?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://news.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/2154203/richard-stallman-speaks-on-the-state-of-free-software-and-answers-questions?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/2024222/should-twitters-edit-button-preserve-your-tweets-history-online?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/0525253/radioactive-souvenirs-from-chernobyl-may-have-been-taken-by-looting-russian-soldiers?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://yro.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/049200/virginia-police-routinely-use-secret-gps-pings-to-track-peoples-cell-phones?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://science.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/0453216/bill-gates-urges-investing-in-faster-development-for-life-saving-drugs?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/topicslashdot.gif" />
<textinput rdf:resource="https://slashdot.org/search.pl" />
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rdf+xml" href="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="slashdot/slashdot" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /></channel>
<image rdf:about="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/topicslashdot.gif">
<title>Slashdot</title>
<url>https://a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/topicslashdot.gif</url>
<link>https://slashdot.org/</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="https://science.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/199203/film-maker-issues-1m-challenge-to-museum-to-repeat-radiocarbon-testing-of-the-shroud-of-turin?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">
<title>Film-Maker Issues $1M Challenge to Museum to Repeat Radiocarbon Testing of the 'Shroud of Turin'</title>
<link>https://science.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/199203/film-maker-issues-1m-challenge-to-museum-to-repeat-radiocarbon-testing-of-the-shroud-of-turin?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed</link>
<description>"It was one of the most eagerly awaited scientific announcements of all time, and it pitted the world of faith against the world of rational thought, under the glare of the media," remembers the Guardian.

So when cutting-edge carbon-14 tests found that the Shroud of Turin was a forgery, it seemed like the final chapter for a relic that had been revered for centuries as the cloth in which Christ's body had been wrapped when he supposedly rose from the dead at the first Easter almost 2,000 years ago. 

But one man &amp;mdash; David Rolfe, a film-maker whose documentary The Silent Witness had brought the shroud into the public eye in modern times, and who had converted to Christianity as a result of his research &amp;mdash; wasn't prepared to give up on it. He was convinced the carbon dating, carried out in 1988 under the direction of the British Museum and Oxford University, had been flawed. And now he claims he has the evidence to prove it. This week sees the release of a new film, Who Can He Be?, in which Rolfe argues that, far from the shroud being a definite dud, new discoveries in the past few years have again opened the question of its authenticity. So convinced is Rolfe that he's issuing a challenge worth $1m to the British Museum. "If ... they believe the shroud is a medieval forgery, I call on them to repeat the exercise, and create something similar today," he says.... 

The sample used for the tests, Rolfe argues in his new film, was too small and taken from a corner where the shroud was likely to have been repaired over the centuries.... 

When it comes to the carbon dating, he's certainly not alone in his scepticism. Barrie M Schwortz, a photographer who documented the shroud in 1978, says "murky" would be a good word to describe the events of 1988. "Today there are at least six peer-reviewed scientific articles that challenge the results of the carbon dating," he says. In his view, the players involved were in a hurry to get the job done, because they wanted to get carbon dating on the map. "Those tests made it a household name, and today it's used widely in archaeology," he says.... 

The British Museum is less willing to get involved this time around. "Any current questions about the shroud would be best put to those who currently care for it in the royal chapel of the cathedral of Turin," a spokesperson said.&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class="share_submission" style="position:relative;"&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Film-Maker+Issues+%241M+Challenge+to+Museum+to+Repeat+Radiocarbon+Testing+of+the+'Shroud+of+Turin'%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F37thrFT"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fscience.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F22%2F04%2F17%2F199203%2Ffilm-maker-issues-1m-challenge-to-museum-to-repeat-radiocarbon-testing-of-the-shroud-of-turin%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;



&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://science.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/199203/film-maker-issues-1m-challenge-to-museum-to-repeat-radiocarbon-testing-of-the-shroud-of-turin?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed"&gt;Read more of this story&lt;/a&gt; at Slashdot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;iframe src="https://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;amp;id=21170622&amp;amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</description>
<dc:creator>EditorDavid</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2022-04-17T19:11:00+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:subject>science</dc:subject>
<slash:department>Easter-surprise</slash:department>
<slash:section>science</slash:section>
<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
<slash:hit_parade>6,6,5,5,3,1,0</slash:hit_parade>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://science.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/1753256/nasa-rolls-back-its-space-launch-system-mega-rocket?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">
<title>NASA Rolls Back Its 'Space Launch System' Mega Rocket</title>
<link>https://science.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/1753256/nasa-rolls-back-its-space-launch-system-mega-rocket?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed</link>
<description>"After three attempts to complete a critical fueling test of the Space Launch System rocket, NASA has decided to take a break," reports Ars Technica:

On Saturday night the space agency announced plans to roll the large SLS rocket from the launch pad at Kennedy Space Center to the Vehicle Assembly Building in the coming days. This marks a notable step back for the program, which has tried since April 1 to complete a "wet dress rehearsal" test, during which the rocket is fueled and brought to within 10 seconds of launch. The decision comes after three tries during the last two weeks. Each fueling attempt was scuttled by one or more technical issues with the rocket, its mobile launch tower, or ground systems that supply propellants and gases. During the most recent attempt, on Thursday April 14, NASA succeeded in loading 49 percent of the core-stage liquid oxygen fuel tank and 5 percent of the liquid hydrogen tank. [NASA reports that the team ended the test after "observing a liquid hydrogen leak on the tail service mast umbilical."] 

While this represents progress, it did not include the most dynamic portion of the test, during which the rocket is fully fueled and pressurized; and it, the ground systems, and computer systems are put into a terminal countdown when every variable is closely monitored. NASA had hoped to complete this wet dress rehearsal test to work out the kinks in the complicated launch system so that, when the rocket is rolled out later this year for its actual launch, the countdown will proceed fairly smoothly. NASA said that its contractors, as well as its agency's, will use the next several weeks to address problems that cropped up during the fueling tests when the SLS rocket returns to the large Vehicle Assembly Building. For example, gaseous nitrogen system supplier Air Liquide will upgrade its capabilities. NASA will also replace a faulty check valve on the upper stage of the rocket, as well as fix a leak on the mobile launch tower's "tail service mast umbilical," a 10-meter-tall structure that provides propellant and electricity lines to the rocket on the pad.... 

Still, NASA seems confident that it will get through this painful teething process for the SLS rocket: a program that is now 11 years old and in which NASA has invested more than $30 billion in the rocket and ground systems now being tested. "There's no doubt in my mind that we will finish this test campaign, and we will listen to the hardware, and the data will lead us to the next step," Blackwell-Thompson said Friday. "And we will take the appropriate steps, and we will launch this vehicle. I don't know exactly what that date is, but there's no doubt in my mind that we'll finish the test campaign, and we will be ready to go fly."&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class="share_submission" style="position:relative;"&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=NASA+Rolls+Back+Its+'Space+Launch+System'+Mega+Rocket%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F38L84BJ"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fscience.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F22%2F04%2F17%2F1753256%2Fnasa-rolls-back-its-space-launch-system-mega-rocket%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;



&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://science.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/1753256/nasa-rolls-back-its-space-launch-system-mega-rocket?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed"&gt;Read more of this story&lt;/a&gt; at Slashdot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;iframe src="https://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;amp;id=21170510&amp;amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</description>
<dc:creator>EditorDavid</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2022-04-17T17:56:00+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:subject>nasa</dc:subject>
<slash:department>back-from-the-launching-pad</slash:department>
<slash:section>science</slash:section>
<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
<slash:hit_parade>14,14,13,13,4,4,2</slash:hit_parade>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://games.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0341201/activision-cooperating-with-federal-insider-trading-probes?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">
<title>Activision Cooperating With Federal Insider Trading Probes</title>
<link>https://games.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0341201/activision-cooperating-with-federal-insider-trading-probes?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed</link>
<description>An anonymous reader quotes Reuters: Activision Blizzard is cooperating with federal investigations into trading by friends of its chief executive shortly before the gaming company disclosed its sale to Microsoft Corp, it said in a securities filing on Friday.
 
It received requests for information from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and received a subpoena from a Department of Justice grand jury, the maker of "Call of Duty" said in an amended proxy filing.
 
The requests "appear to relate to their respective investigations into trading by third parties &amp;ndash; including persons known to Activision Blizzard's CEO &amp;ndash; in securities prior to the announcement of the proposed transaction," it said.&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class="share_submission" style="position:relative;"&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Activision+Cooperating+With+Federal+Insider+Trading+Probes%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F3jQ5Ymg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fgames.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F22%2F04%2F17%2F0341201%2Factivision-cooperating-with-federal-insider-trading-probes%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;



&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://games.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0341201/activision-cooperating-with-federal-insider-trading-probes?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed"&gt;Read more of this story&lt;/a&gt; at Slashdot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;iframe src="https://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;amp;id=21168920&amp;amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</description>
<dc:creator>FirehoseFavorites</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2022-04-17T16:34:00+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:subject>court</dc:subject>
<slash:department>you-hear-that-mr-anderson</slash:department>
<slash:section>games</slash:section>
<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
<slash:hit_parade>5,5,5,4,0,0,0</slash:hit_parade>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://news.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/238221/richard-stallman-calls-for-software-package-systems-that-help-maintain-your-freedoms?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">
<title>Richard Stallman Calls for Software Package Systems that Help Maintain Your Freedoms</title>
<link>https://news.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/238221/richard-stallman-calls-for-software-package-systems-that-help-maintain-your-freedoms?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed</link>
<description>Last week 69-year-old Richard Stallman gave a 92-minute presentation on the state of the free software movement. Stallman covered numerous topics, but also added as an aside at one point:
 Ubuntu of course is a non-free distro, and I wouldn't recommend that anyone use it. Some important packages are now distributed only through their non-freedom-respecting package system, and not as Debian packages. So it's even harder than before to get any freedom out of an Ubuntu installation. 
But Stallman also sees a larger issue:

 Another area where we have problems is there are several languages which come with a package library -- basically people post packages in them. And that might be fine if they had a good criterion for the licensing of the libraries people upload into those sites -- but they're not developed by free software activists, and they don't have such a criterion. There are non-free packages in those libraries too. 

Now, some of them make it possible to find out whether a library is free. Some of them, it's difficult. Sometimes -- yeah, you could probably look at the source code and see what licenses are in it, and then you could look up those licenses in GNU.org/licenses/license-list.html and see if all those licenses are free... The problem is, they don't help you. At the very least they should make it easy to say, "Show me only the free packages." And then, "Show me only the GPL-compatible packages, because I'm writing a GPL-covered program, and I can't use the libraries that are not GPL compatible. And I certainly won't ever think of using a non-free library." 
They're not interested in helping people move forward in freedom. And so we need people to write front-ends for those package archives, which will show only the freely-licensed packages, and which can be asked to show which ones are GPL-compatible, or show only those. This way they will be usable easily by the free software community. If you like one of the languages that has this problem, please show your appreciation for that language by reconciling its use with maintaining freedom. 


And this leads Stallman to a related setback for the free software movement: the containers themselves that are packaging some programs with the libraries they need:


 The old way of doing this was you would make sure that your program said which versions of libraries it was compiled to work with, and in the source code you'd use something like Autoconf so that it could work with the various library versions. And this way you could build the program for a wide variety of free operating systems and versions of them. 
Well, that's some work, so some developers, they release a free program -- not all of them release free programs, but some of them do release free programs -- using containers. And the container has one set of libraries in it. And how do you really know what's in there? It's not straightforward to verify that all the libraries in the container are free, and a lot of people won't realize that they should even think about it. So the use of containers, as they are implemented nowadays by people who are not free software activists and are not particularly concerned with this question, is an obstacle to verifying that you're installing free software. 
Well, maybe some of these container systems could be improved, or maybe another one could be designed to solve these problems. If a container packaging system were designed by people who care about freedom, they might find good ways to satisfy this goal, as well as others. So it's something you could possibly work on.&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class="share_submission" style="position:relative;"&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Richard+Stallman+Calls+for+Software+Package+Systems+that+Help+Maintain+Your+Freedoms%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F3JTmEUC"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F22%2F04%2F16%2F238221%2Frichard-stallman-calls-for-software-package-systems-that-help-maintain-your-freedoms%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;



&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://news.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/238221/richard-stallman-calls-for-software-package-systems-that-help-maintain-your-freedoms?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed"&gt;Read more of this story&lt;/a&gt; at Slashdot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;iframe src="https://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;amp;id=21168266&amp;amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</description>
<dc:creator>EditorDavid</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2022-04-17T15:34:00+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:subject>gnu</dc:subject>
<slash:department>going-to-the-libraries</slash:department>
<slash:section>news</slash:section>
<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
<slash:hit_parade>43,41,33,30,11,5,2</slash:hit_parade>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://linux.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0229214/razers-first-linux-laptop-called-sexy---but-its-not-for-gamers?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">
<title>Razer's First Linux Laptop Called 'Sexy' - But It's Not for Gamers</title>
<link>https://linux.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0229214/razers-first-linux-laptop-called-sexy---but-its-not-for-gamers?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed</link>
<description>A headline at Hot Hardware calls it "a sexy Linux laptop with deep learning chops... being pitched as the world's most powerful laptop for machine learning workloads." 

And here's how Ars Technica describes the Razer x Lambda Tensorbook (announced Tuesday):

Made in collaboration with Lambda, the Linux-based clamshell focuses on deep-learning development. Lambda, which has been around since 2012, is a deep-learning infrastructure provider used by the US Department of Defense and "97 percent of the top research universities in the US," according to the company's announcement. Lambda's offerings include GPU clusters, servers, workstations, and cloud instances that train neural networks for various use cases, including self-driving cars, cancer detection, and drug discovery. 

Dubbed "The Deep Learning Laptop," the Tensorbook has an Nvidia RTX 3080 Max-Q (16GB) and targets machine-learning engineers, especially those who lack a laptop with a discrete GPU and thus have to share a remote machine's resources, which negatively affects development.... "When you're stuck SSHing into a remote server, you don't have any of your local data or code and even have a hard time demoing your model to colleagues," Lambda co-founder and CEO Stephen Balaban said in a statement, noting that the laptop comes with PyTorch and TensorFlow for quickly training and demoing models from a local GUI interface without SSH. Lambda isn't a laptop maker, so it recruited Razer to build the machine.... 
While there are more powerful laptops available, the Tensorbook stands out because of its software package and Ubuntu Linux 20.04 LTS. 

The Verge writes:
While Razer currently offers faster CPU, GPU and screens in today's Blade lineup, it's not necessarily a bad deal if you love the design, considering how pricey Razer's laptops can be. But we've generally found that Razer's thin machines run quite hot in our reviews, and the Blade in question was no exception even with a quarter of the memory and a less powerful RTX 3060 GPU. Lambda's FAQ page does not address heat as of today. 

Lambda is clearly aiming this one at prospective MacBook Pro buyers, and I don't just say that because of the silver tones. The primary hardware comparison the company touts is a 4x speedup over Apple's M1 Max in a 16-inch MacBook Pro when running TensorFlow. 
Specifically, Lambda's web site claims the new laptop "delivers model training performance up to 4x faster than Apple's M1 Max, and up to 10x faster than Google Colab instances." And it credits this to the laptop's use of NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q 16GB GPU, adding that NVIDIA GPUs "are the industry standard for parallel processing, ensuring leading performance and compatibility with all machine learning frameworks and tools." 

"It looks like a fine package and machine, but pricing starts at $3,499," notes Hot Hardware, adding "There's a $500 up-charge to have it configured to dual-boot Windows 10." 

The Verge speculates on what this might portend for the future. "Perhaps the recently renewed interest in Linux gaming, driven by the Steam Deck, will push Razer to consider Linux for its own core products as well."&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class="share_submission" style="position:relative;"&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Razer's+First+Linux+Laptop+Called+'Sexy'+-+But+It's+Not+for+Gamers%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F3jK2x0q"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Flinux.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F22%2F04%2F17%2F0229214%2Frazers-first-linux-laptop-called-sexy---but-its-not-for-gamers%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;



&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://linux.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0229214/razers-first-linux-laptop-called-sexy---but-its-not-for-gamers?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed"&gt;Read more of this story&lt;/a&gt; at Slashdot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;iframe src="https://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;amp;id=21168796&amp;amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</description>
<dc:creator>EditorDavid</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2022-04-17T14:34:00+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:subject>graphics</dc:subject>
<slash:department>machines-learning</slash:department>
<slash:section>linux</slash:section>
<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
<slash:hit_parade>30,30,26,22,4,0,0</slash:hit_parade>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://tech.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0140208/ukraine-opens-russian-drone-finds-duct-tape-and-canon-dslr-inside?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">
<title>Ukraine Opens Russian Drone, Finds Duct Tape and Canon DSLR Inside</title>
<link>https://tech.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0140208/ukraine-opens-russian-drone-finds-duct-tape-and-canon-dslr-inside?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed</link>
<description>Long-time Slashdot reader wired_parrot writes:
After the Ukrainian army captured one of Russia's Orlan-10 unmanned aerial vehicles, they decided to do a teardown of it. Their findings show a remarkable amount of jerry-rigged installations using off the shelf components, including the use of a Canon DSLR camera as the main image capturing sensor. 

Petapixel notes it's a camera first launched in 2015 "with a retail price of $750 but which is currently worth about $300 to $400 on the used market... The camera is mounted to a board with a hook-and-loop fastener strip (commonly referred to as Velcro)." 

The Ukranian Ministry of Defense posted a video showing one of one of its soldiers exploring the alleged Russian drone, and Petapixel shares more details and some screen grabs:

The soldier notes how surprisingly low-tech the military drone is &amp;mdash; observers quickly pointed out that certain aspects of it are more reminiscent of a hobbyist RC airplane project than a high-tech piece of military spying technology.... 

On the top of the drone, the fuel tank's cap suggests that it may have been made from some kind of plastic water bottle. Various parts of the drone are also fixed together with some kind of duct tape.&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class="share_submission" style="position:relative;"&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Ukraine+Opens+Russian+Drone%2C+Finds+Duct+Tape+and+Canon+DSLR+Inside%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F38QouJ7"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftech.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F22%2F04%2F17%2F0140208%2Fukraine-opens-russian-drone-finds-duct-tape-and-canon-dslr-inside%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;



&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://tech.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0140208/ukraine-opens-russian-drone-finds-duct-tape-and-canon-dslr-inside?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed"&gt;Read more of this story&lt;/a&gt; at Slashdot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;iframe src="https://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;amp;id=21168704&amp;amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</description>
<dc:creator>EditorDavid</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2022-04-17T11:34:00+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:subject>military</dc:subject>
<slash:department>spared-parts</slash:department>
<slash:section>technology</slash:section>
<slash:comments>157</slash:comments>
<slash:hit_parade>157,153,133,118,27,12,9</slash:hit_parade>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://tech.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0444211/is-windows-11-less-popular-than-windows-xp?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">
<title>Is Windows 11 Less Popular Than Windows XP?</title>
<link>https://tech.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0444211/is-windows-11-less-popular-than-windows-xp?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed</link>
<description>"A new survey claims Windows 11 adoption is so low it's actually less popular than the 20-year-old Windows XP," reports PC Magazine:

The survey comes from an IT management provider called Lansweeper. Through its own software products, the company scanned 10 million Windows devices this month to determine which OS they were using. The results found that only 1.44% of the devices had Windows 11 installed, which is lower than the 1.71% for Windows XP. In contrast, Windows 10 maintains a dominant share at 80.34%. Although Windows 11's adoption is low at 1.44%, the number actually went up almost three times from 0.52% back in January. 

It's also important to note that other surveys have found much higher Windows 11 adoption numbers. Last month, the app advertising platform AdDuplex found Windows 11 usage was at 19.4%, although this represented a mere 0.1% growth from the previous month. Meanwhile, the Steam hardware survey from Valve estimates Windows 11 usage has reached 16.8%.&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class="share_submission" style="position:relative;"&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Is+Windows+11+Less+Popular+Than+Windows+XP%3F%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F3jHrNER"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftech.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F22%2F04%2F17%2F0444211%2Fis-windows-11-less-popular-than-windows-xp%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;



&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://tech.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0444211/is-windows-11-less-popular-than-windows-xp?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed"&gt;Read more of this story&lt;/a&gt; at Slashdot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;iframe src="https://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;amp;id=21169054&amp;amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</description>
<dc:creator>EditorDavid</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2022-04-17T07:54:00+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:subject>windows</dc:subject>
<slash:department>survey-says</slash:department>
<slash:section>technology</slash:section>
<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
<slash:hit_parade>83,79,67,60,20,8,6</slash:hit_parade>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://science.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0426203/us-space-command-releases-decades-of-secret-military-data-confirms-interstellar-meteor-in-2014?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">
<title>US Space Command Releases Decades of Secret Military Data, Confirms Interstellar Meteor in 2014</title>
<link>https://science.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0426203/us-space-command-releases-decades-of-secret-military-data-confirms-interstellar-meteor-in-2014?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed</link>
<description>"The U.S. Space Command announced this week that it determined a 2014 meteor hit that hit Earth was from outside the solar system," reports CBS News. "The meteor streaked across the sky off the coast of Manus Island, Papua New Guinea three years earlier than what was believed to be the first confirmed interstellar object detected entering our solar system." 

After Oumuamua was spotted in 2017, the interstellar comet Borisov appeared in 2019 &amp;mdash; discovered in Crimea, Ukraine at a "personal observatory" built by amateur astronomer Gennadiy Borisov" 

But CBS notes that despite their theory about a first interstellar meteor in 2014, the two Harvard astronomers &amp;mdash; Dr. Amir Siraj and Dr. Abraham Loeb &amp;mdash; "had trouble getting their paper published, because they used classified information from the government." Specifically, data from a classified U.S. government satellite designed to detect foreign missiles...
The meteor was unusual because of its very high speed and unusual direction &amp;mdash; which suggested it came from interstellar space.... Any space object traveling more than about 42 kilometers per second may come from interstellar space. The data showed the 2014 Manus Island fireball hit the Earth's atmosphere at about 45 kilometers per second, which was "very promising" in identifying it as interstellar, Siraj said.... 

After more research and help from other scientists, including classified information from the government about the accuracy or level of precision of the data, Siraj and Loeb determined with 99.999% certainty the object was interstellar. But their paper on the finding was being turned down, because the pair only had a private conversation with an anonymous U.S. government employee to confirm the accuracy of the data. 

"We had thought this was a lost cause," Dr. Siraj told the New York Times &amp;mdash; which couldn't resist adding that "it turned out, the truth was out there."

Last month, the U.S. Space Command released a memo to NASA scientists that stated the data from the missile warning satellites' sensors "was sufficiently accurate to indicate an interstellar trajectory" for the meteor. The publication of the memo was the culmination of a three-year effort by Siraj and a well-known Harvard astronomer, Avi Loeb. 

Many scientists, including those at NASA, say that the military still has not released enough data to confirm the interstellar origins of the space rock, and a spokesperson said Space Command would defer to other authorities on the question. 

But it wasn't the only information about meteors to be released. The military also handed NASA decades of secret military data on the brightness of hundreds of other fireballs, or bolides. "It's an unusual degree of visibility of a set of data coming from that world," said Matt Daniels, assistant director for space security at the White House's Office of Science and Technology Policy, who worked on the data release. "We're in this renewed period of excitement and activity in space programs generally, and in the midst of that, I think thoughtful leaders in multiple places said, 'you know, now is a good time to do this.'" 
The Times notes that data from classified military satellites "could also aid NASA in its federally assigned role as defender of planet Earth from killer asteroids. And that is the goal of a new agreement with the U.S. Space Force that aims to help NASA's Planetary Defense Coordination Office better understand what happens when space rocks reach the atmosphere."

Sharing sensitive military satellite data with astronomers has led to significant scientific discoveries in the past. 

A group of satellites deployed in the 1960s by the United States to detect covert detonations of nuclear weapons on Earth accidentally became the key instruments used to make the first detection of extraterrestrial gamma ray bursts. The bursts showed up on the satellites, code-named Vela, as single bursts of energy, confusing analysts at Los Alamos who later declassified the data in a 1973 paper that spurred academic debate about the bursts' origins.... 

A core reason for Space Force's increasing ties with NASA has centered on the agency's congressional mandate to detect nearly all asteroids that could threaten the Earth. When NASA signed an agreement in 2020 to strengthen ties with Space Force, the agency acknowledged it had fallen behind in its asteroid-tracking efforts and would need Pentagon resources to carry out its planetary defense mission.&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class="share_submission" style="position:relative;"&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=US+Space+Command+Releases+Decades+of+Secret+Military+Data%2C+Confirms+Interstellar+Meteor+in+2014%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F3xwB76s"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fscience.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F22%2F04%2F17%2F0426203%2Fus-space-command-releases-decades-of-secret-military-data-confirms-interstellar-meteor-in-2014%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;



&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://science.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0426203/us-space-command-releases-decades-of-secret-military-data-confirms-interstellar-meteor-in-2014?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed"&gt;Read more of this story&lt;/a&gt; at Slashdot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;iframe src="https://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;amp;id=21169014&amp;amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</description>
<dc:creator>EditorDavid</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2022-04-17T04:34:00+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:subject>space</dc:subject>
<slash:department>space-rocks</slash:department>
<slash:section>science</slash:section>
<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
<slash:hit_parade>10,8,8,7,0,0,0</slash:hit_parade>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://it.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0030249/github-issues-security-alert-after-spotting-misuse-of-tokens-stolen-from-oauth-integrators?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">
<title>GitHub Issues Security Alert After Spotting Misuse of Tokens Stolen from OAuth Integrators</title>
<link>https://it.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0030249/github-issues-security-alert-after-spotting-misuse-of-tokens-stolen-from-oauth-integrators?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed</link>
<description>GitHub issued a security alert Friday. 
GitHub's chief security officer wrote that on Tuesday, "GitHub Security began an investigation that uncovered evidence that an attacker abused stolen OAuth user tokens issued to two third-party OAuth integrators, Heroku and Travis-CI, to download data from dozens of organizations, including npm..." 

We do not believe the attacker obtained these tokens via a compromise of GitHub or its systems, because the tokens in question are not stored by GitHub in their original, usable formats. Following immediate investigation, we disclosed our findings to Heroku and Travis-CI on April 13 and 14... 

Looking across the entire GitHub platform, we have high confidence that compromised OAuth user tokens from Heroku and Travis-CI-maintained OAuth applications were stolen and abused to download private repositories belonging to dozens of victim organizations that were using these apps. Our analysis of other behavior by the threat actor suggests that the actors may be mining the downloaded private repository contents, to which the stolen OAuth token had access, for secrets that could be used to pivot into other infrastructure. 

We are sharing this today as we believe the attacks may be ongoing and action is required for customers to protect themselves. 


The initial detection related to this campaign occurred on April 12 when GitHub Security identified unauthorized access to our npm production infrastructure using a compromised AWS API key. Based on subsequent analysis, we believe this API key was obtained by the attacker when they downloaded a set of private npm repositories using a stolen OAuth token from one of the two affected third-party OAuth applications described above. Upon discovering the broader theft of third-party OAuth tokens not stored by GitHub or npm on the evening of April 13, we immediately took action to protect GitHub and npm by revoking tokens associated with GitHub and npm's internal use of these compromised applications. 

We believe that the two impacts to npm are unauthorized access to, and downloading of, the private repositories in the npm organization on GitHub.com and potential access to the npm packages as they exist in AWS S3 storage. 

At this point, we assess that the attacker did not modify any packages or gain access to any user account data or credentials. We are still working to understand whether the attacker viewed or downloaded private packages. 

npm uses completely separate infrastructure from GitHub.com; GitHub was not affected in this original attack. Though investigation continues, we have found no evidence that other GitHub-owned private repos were cloned by the attacker using stolen third-party OAuth tokens.
 
Once GitHub identified stolen third-party OAuth tokens affecting GitHub users, GitHub took immediate steps to respond and protect users. GitHub contacted Heroku and Travis-CI to request that they initiate their own security investigations, revoke all OAuth user tokens associated with the affected applications, and begin work to notify their own users.... GitHub is currently working to identify and notify all of the known-affected victim users and organizations that we discovered through our analysis across GitHub.com. These customers will receive a notification email from GitHub with additional details and next steps to assist in their own response within the next 72 hours.
If you do not receive a notification, you and/or your organization have not been identified as affected. 

You should, however, periodically review what OAuth applications you've authorized or are authorized to access your organization and prune anything that's no longer needed.
You can also review your organization audit logs and user account security logs for unexpected or anomalous activity.... 



The security and trustworthiness of GitHub, npm, and the broader developer ecosystem is our highest priority. Our investigation is ongoing, and we will update this blog, and our communications with affected customers, as we learn more.&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class="share_submission" style="position:relative;"&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=GitHub+Issues+Security+Alert+After+Spotting+Misuse+of+Tokens+Stolen+from+OAuth+Integrators%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F38POxA5"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fit.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F22%2F04%2F17%2F0030249%2Fgithub-issues-security-alert-after-spotting-misuse-of-tokens-stolen-from-oauth-integrators%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;



&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://it.slashdot.org/story/22/04/17/0030249/github-issues-security-alert-after-spotting-misuse-of-tokens-stolen-from-oauth-integrators?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed"&gt;Read more of this story&lt;/a&gt; at Slashdot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;iframe src="https://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;amp;id=21168548&amp;amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</description>
<dc:creator>EditorDavid</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2022-04-17T01:34:00+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:subject>security</dc:subject>
<slash:department>dis-integration</slash:department>
<slash:section>it</slash:section>
<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
<slash:hit_parade>14,12,7,4,1,0,0</slash:hit_parade>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://tech.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/0053230/social-media-made-us-stupid---and-how-to-fix-it?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">
<title>Social Media Made Us Stupid - and How to Fix It  </title>
<link>https://tech.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/0053230/social-media-made-us-stupid---and-how-to-fix-it?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed</link>
<description>Jonathan Haidt, a social psychologist at the New York University's School of Business, argues in the Atlantic that social-media platforms "trained users to spend more time performing and less time connecting." But that was just the beginning. 

He now believes this ultimately fueled a viral dynamic leading to "the continual chipping-away of trust" in a democracy which "depends on widely internalized acceptance of the legitimacy of rules, norms, and institutions."

The most recent Edelman Trust Barometer (an international measure of citizens' trust in government, business, media, and nongovernmental organizations) showed stable and competent autocracies (China and the United Arab Emirates) at the top of the list, while contentious democracies such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Spain, and South Korea scored near the bottom (albeit above Russia).... Mark Zuckerberg may not have wished for any of that. But by rewiring everything in a headlong rush for growth &amp;mdash; with a naive conception of human psychology, little understanding of the intricacy of institutions, and no concern for external costs imposed on society &amp;mdash; Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and a few other large platforms unwittingly dissolved the mortar of trust, belief in institutions, and shared stories that had held a large and diverse secular democracy together. 
In the last 10 years, the article argues, the general public &amp;mdash; at least in America &amp;mdash; became "uniquely stupid." And he's not just speaking about the political right and left, but within both factions, "as well as within universities, companies, professional associations, museums, and even families." The article quotes former CIA analyst Martin Gurri's comment in 2019 that the digital revolution has highly fragmented the public into hostile shards that are "mostly people yelling at each other and living in bubbles of one sort or another." 

The article concludes that by now U.S. politics has entered a phase where truth "cannot achieve widespread adherence" and thus "nothing really means anything anymore--at least not in a way that is durable and on which people widely agree." It even contemplates the idea of "highly believable" disinformation generated by AI, possibly by geopolitical adversaries, ultimately evolving into what the research manager at the Stanford Internet Observatory has described as "an Information World War in which state actors, terrorists, and ideological extremists leverage the social infrastructure underpinning everyday life to sow discord and erode shared reality." 

But then the article also suggests possible reforms:
The Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen advocates for simple changes to the architecture of the platforms, rather than for massive and ultimately futile efforts to police all content. For example, she has suggested modifying the "Share" function on Facebook so that after any content has been shared twice, the third person in the chain must take the time to copy and paste the content into a new post. Reforms like this...don't stop anyone from saying anything; they just slow the spread of content that is, on average, less likely to be true. 
Perhaps the biggest single change that would reduce the toxicity of existing platforms would be user verification as a precondition for gaining the algorithmic amplification that social media offers. Banks and other industries have "know your customer" rules so that they can't do business with anonymous clients laundering money from criminal enterprises. Large social-media platforms should be required to do the same.... This one change would wipe out most of the hundreds of millions of bots and fake accounts that currently pollute the major platforms.... Research shows that antisocial behavior becomes more common online when people feel that their identity is unknown and untraceable. 

In any case, the growing evidence that social media is damaging democracy is sufficient to warrant greater oversight by a regulatory body, such as the Federal Communications Commission or the Federal Trade Commission. One of the first orders of business should be compelling the platforms to share their data and their algorithms with academic researchers. 

The members of Gen Z--those born in and after 1997--bear none of the blame for the mess we are in, but they are going to inherit it, and the preliminary signs are that older generations have prevented them from learning how to handle it.... Congress should update the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, which unwisely set the age of so-called internet adulthood (the age at which companies can collect personal information from children without parental consent) at 13 back in 1998, while making little provision for effective enforcement. The age should be raised to at least 16, and companies should be held responsible for enforcing it. More generally, to prepare the members of the next generation for post-Babel democracy, perhaps the most important thing we can do is let them out to play. Stop starving children of the experiences they most need to become good citizens: free play in mixed-age groups of children with minimal adult supervision... 

The article closes with its own note of hope &amp;mdash; and a call to action:

In recent years, Americans have started hundreds of groups and organizations dedicated to building trust and friendship across the political divide, including BridgeUSA, Braver Angels (on whose board I serve), and many others listed at BridgeAlliance.us. We cannot expect Congress and the tech companies to save us. We must change ourselves and our communities.&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class="share_submission" style="position:relative;"&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Social+Media+Made+Us+Stupid+-+and+How+to+Fix+It++%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F36l2Z2l"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftech.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F22%2F04%2F16%2F0053230%2Fsocial-media-made-us-stupid---and-how-to-fix-it%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;



&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://tech.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/0053230/social-media-made-us-stupid---and-how-to-fix-it?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed"&gt;Read more of this story&lt;/a&gt; at Slashdot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;iframe src="https://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;amp;id=21164156&amp;amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</description>
<dc:creator>EditorDavid</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2022-04-16T23:25:00+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:subject>ai</dc:subject>
<slash:department>I'm-with-stupid</slash:department>
<slash:section>technology</slash:section>
<slash:comments>108</slash:comments>
<slash:hit_parade>108,103,92,73,21,12,7</slash:hit_parade>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://news.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/2154203/richard-stallman-speaks-on-the-state-of-free-software-and-answers-questions?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">
<title>Richard Stallman Speaks on the State of Free Software, and Answers Questions</title>
<link>https://news.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/2154203/richard-stallman-speaks-on-the-state-of-free-software-and-answers-questions?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed</link>
<description>Richard Stallman celebrated his 69th birthday last month. And Wednesday, he gave a 92-minute presentation called "The State of the Free Software Movement." 

Stallman began by thanking everyone who's contributed to free software, and encouraged others who want to help to visit gnu.org/help. "The Free Software movement is universal, and morally should not exclude anyone. Because even though there are crimes that should be punished, cutting off someone from contributing to free software punishes the world. Not that person." 

And then he began by noting some things that have gotten better in the free software movement, including big improvements in projects like GNU Emacs when displaying external packages. (And in addition, "GNU Health now has a hospital management facility, which should make it applicable to a lot more medical organizations so they can switch to free software. And [Skype alternative] GNU Jami got a big upgrade.") 

 What's getting worse? Well, the libre-booted machines that we have are getting older and scarcer. Finding a way to support something new is difficult, because Intel and AMD are both designing their hardware to subjugate people. If they were basically haters of the public, it would be hard for them to do it much worse than they're doing. 

And Macintoshes are moving towards being jails, like the iMonsters. It's getting harder for users to install even their own programs to run them. And this of course should be illegal. It should be illegal to sell a computer that doesn't let users install software of their own from source code. And probably shouldn't allow the computer to stop you from installing binaries that you get from others either, even though it's true in cases like that, you're doing it at your own risk. But tying people down, strapping them into their chairs so that they can't do anything that hurts themselves -- makes things worse, not better. There are other systems where you can find ways to trust people, that don't depend on being under the power of a giant company. 



We've seen problems sometimes where supported old hardware gets de-supported because somebody doesn't think it's important any more &amp;mdash; it's so old, how could that matter? But there are reasons...why old hardware sometimes remains very important, and people who aren't thinking about this issue might not realize that... 

Stallman also had some advice for students required by their schools to use non-free software like Zoom for their remote learning. "If you have to use a non-free program, there's one last thing... which is to say in each class session, 'I am bitterly ashamed of the fact that I'm using Zoom for this class.' Just that. It's a few seconds. But say it each time.... And over time, the fact that this is really important to you will sink in." 

And then halfway through, Stallman began taking questions from the audience... 

Read on for Slashdot's report on Stallman's remarks, or jump ahead to...
	 How far should copyright law go? That NPM package that deleted files in Russia Does the free software world need more videogames? Stallman's upcoming manual for 'GNU C' Free Software's role in protecting our planet's environment&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class="share_submission" style="position:relative;"&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Richard+Stallman+Speaks+on+the+State+of+Free+Software%2C+and+Answers+Questions%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F3ry3uNP"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F22%2F04%2F16%2F2154203%2Frichard-stallman-speaks-on-the-state-of-free-software-and-answers-questions%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;



&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://news.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/2154203/richard-stallman-speaks-on-the-state-of-free-software-and-answers-questions?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed"&gt;Read more of this story&lt;/a&gt; at Slashdot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;iframe src="https://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;amp;id=21167994&amp;amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</description>
<dc:creator>EditorDavid</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2022-04-16T21:59:00+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:subject>gnu</dc:subject>
<slash:department>joining-us-now</slash:department>
<slash:section>news</slash:section>
<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
<slash:hit_parade>78,66,56,54,22,10,7</slash:hit_parade>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/2024222/should-twitters-edit-button-preserve-your-tweets-history-online?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">
<title>Should Twitter's 'Edit' Button Preserve Your Tweet's History Online?</title>
<link>https://slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/2024222/should-twitters-edit-button-preserve-your-tweets-history-online?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed</link>
<description>The Verge reports that "Editing a tweet using Twitter's upcoming edit button could leave a digital trace of your tweet's history, according to reverse engineer Jane Manchun Wong."

In a tweet, Manchun Wong explains that the edit function appears to have an "immutable" quality, which means Twitter may create an entirely new tweet when one is edited, all while preserving the previous versions of that tweet. 

"Looks like Twitter's approach to Edit Tweet is immutable, as in, instead of mutating the Tweet text within the same Tweet (same ID), it re-creates a new Tweet with the amended content, along with the list of the old Tweets prior of that edit," Manchun Wong says. 

As Manchun Wong notes, it's unclear how a tweet's edit history will appear to users, or if it will at all. But if Twitter does decide to make tweet history public, it could be a way to address concerns over potential abuse of the feature, as some critics believe it could be used to alter the public record and mislead users.
 
But in the end, it's two entirely separate questions. Will Twitter's edit functionality preserve a tweet's history online?

 And should it?&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class="share_submission" style="position:relative;"&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Should+Twitter's+'Edit'+Button+Preserve+Your+Tweet's+History+Online%3F%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F3rxdxTc"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fslashdot.org%2Fstory%2F22%2F04%2F16%2F2024222%2Fshould-twitters-edit-button-preserve-your-tweets-history-online%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;



&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/2024222/should-twitters-edit-button-preserve-your-tweets-history-online?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed"&gt;Read more of this story&lt;/a&gt; at Slashdot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;iframe src="https://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;amp;id=21167726&amp;amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</description>
<dc:creator>EditorDavid</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2022-04-16T20:27:00+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:subject>twitter</dc:subject>
<slash:department>tweet-this-not-that</slash:department>
<slash:section>slashdot</slash:section>
<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
<slash:hit_parade>47,46,31,27,12,7,4</slash:hit_parade>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/0525253/radioactive-souvenirs-from-chernobyl-may-have-been-taken-by-looting-russian-soldiers?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">
<title>Radioactive 'Souvenirs' from Chernobyl May Have Been Taken by Looting Russian Soldiers</title>
<link>https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/0525253/radioactive-souvenirs-from-chernobyl-may-have-been-taken-by-looting-russian-soldiers?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed</link>
<description>Earlier this week the Voice of America news service shared a story that begins with exclusive photos from a nuclear lab "from which a Ukrainian official says Russian troops stole radioactive material that could be harmful if mishandled...."

It is housed in a building run by a state agency managing the exclusion zone around Chernobyl's nearby decommissioned nuclear power plant, where a 1986 explosion caused the world's worst nuclear accident. The director of the agency, Evgen Kramarenko, provided the laboratory photos to VOA, saying he took them on an April 5 visit, five days after Russian troops withdrew from Chernobyl.... 
"We have a laboratory that had a big quantity of radioactive instruments that are used to calibrate our radiation dosimeters," Kramarenko told VOA. A dosimeter is a safety device, typically worn by individuals as a badge, that measures exposure to ionizing radiation, including nuclear radiation. The agency's dosimeters are calibrated using small metallic containers of radioactive material made by Ukrainian state enterprise USIE Izotop, which displays a photo of them on its website. 

"Most of those calibration instruments were stolen. They look like coins. If the Russian soldiers carry them around, it's very dangerous for them," Kramarenko said.... 

In a Saturday Facebook post, Kramarenko's agency said occupying Russian troops stole samples of fuel-containing materials from the lab in addition to the radioactive calibration instruments. The agency said it was possible that the Russians threw away the items elsewhere in Chernobyl's exclusion zone, but that a likelier scenario is that they kept items as "souvenirs."&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class="share_submission" style="position:relative;"&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Radioactive+'Souvenirs'+from+Chernobyl+May+Have+Been+Taken+by+Looting+Russian+Soldiers%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F3M0Tk02"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fhardware.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F22%2F04%2F16%2F0525253%2Fradioactive-souvenirs-from-chernobyl-may-have-been-taken-by-looting-russian-soldiers%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;



&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/0525253/radioactive-souvenirs-from-chernobyl-may-have-been-taken-by-looting-russian-soldiers?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed"&gt;Read more of this story&lt;/a&gt; at Slashdot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;iframe src="https://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;amp;id=21164828&amp;amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</description>
<dc:creator>EditorDavid</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2022-04-16T18:34:00+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:subject>power</dc:subject>
<slash:department>Darwin-awards</slash:department>
<slash:section>hardware</slash:section>
<slash:comments>114</slash:comments>
<slash:hit_parade>114,112,100,94,21,11,9</slash:hit_parade>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://yro.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/049200/virginia-police-routinely-use-secret-gps-pings-to-track-peoples-cell-phones?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">
<title>Virginia Police Routinely Use Secret GPS Pings To Track People's Cell Phones</title>
<link>https://yro.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/049200/virginia-police-routinely-use-secret-gps-pings-to-track-peoples-cell-phones?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed</link>
<description>The nonprofit online news site Virginia Mercury investigated their state police departments' "real-time location warrants," which are "addressed to telephone companies, ordering them to regularly ping a customers' phone for its GPS location and share the results with police."

Public records requests submitted to a sampling of 18 police departments around the state found officers used the technique to conduct more than 7,000 days worth of surveillance in 2020. Court records show the tracking efforts spanned cases ranging from high-profile murders to minor larcenies.... Seven departments responded that they did not have any relevant billing records, indicating they don't use the technique. Only one of the departments surveyed, Alexandria, indicated it had an internal policy governing how their officers use cellphone tracking, but a copy of the document provided by the city was entirely redacted.... 

Drug investigations accounted for more than 60 percent of the search warrants taken out in the two jurisdictions. Larcenies were the second most frequent category. Major crimes like murders, rapes and abductions made up a fraction of the tracking requests, accounting for just under 25 of the nearly 400 warrants filed in the jurisdictions that year. 

America's Supreme Court "ruled that warrantless cellphone tracking is unconstitutional back in 2012," the article points out &amp;mdash; but in practice those warrants aren't hard to get. "Officers simply have to attest in an affidavit that they have probable cause that the tracking data is 'relevant to a crime that is being committed or has been committed'.... There's been limited public discussion or awareness of the kinds of tracking warrants the judiciary is approving."

"I don't think people know that their cell phones can be converted to tracking devices by police with no notice," said Steve Benjamin, a criminal defense lawyer in Richmond who said he's recently noticed an uptick in cases in which officers employed the technique. "And the reality of modern life is everyone has their phone on them during the day and on their nightstand at night. ... It's as if the police tagged them with a chip under their skin, and people have no idea how easily this is accomplished." 


The case for these phone-tracking warrants?
 The executive director of the Virginia Association of Chiefs of Police tells the site that physical surveillance ofen requires too many resources &amp;mdash; and that cellphone tracking is safer. "It may be considered an intrusive way of gathering data on someone, but it's certainly less dangerous than physical tracking."

A spokesperson for the Chesterfield County police department [responsible for 64% of the state's tracking] argued that "We exist to preserve human life and protect the vulnerable, and we will use all lawful tools at our disposal to do so." And they added that such "continued robust enforcement efforts" were a part of the reason that the county's still-rising number of fatal drug overdoses had not risen more.

The site also obtained bills from four major US cellphone carriers, and reported how much they were charging police for providing their cellphone-tracking services:

"T-Mobile charged $30 per day, which comes to $900 per month of tracking."
"AT&amp;amp;T charged a monthly service fee of $100 and an additional $25 per day the service is utilized, which comes to $850 per 30 days of tracking..."
"Verizon calls the service 'periodic location updates,' charging $5 per day on top of a monthly service fee of $100, which comes to $200 per 30 days of tracking."
"Sprint offered the cheapest prices to report locations back to law enforcement, charging a flat fee of $100 per month."
 
Thanks to Slashdot reader Beerismydad for sharing the article!&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class="share_submission" style="position:relative;"&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Virginia+Police+Routinely+Use+Secret+GPS+Pings+To+Track+People's+Cell+Phones%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F3uWQ7Jn"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fyro.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F22%2F04%2F16%2F049200%2Fvirginia-police-routinely-use-secret-gps-pings-to-track-peoples-cell-phones%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;



&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://yro.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/049200/virginia-police-routinely-use-secret-gps-pings-to-track-peoples-cell-phones?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed"&gt;Read more of this story&lt;/a&gt; at Slashdot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;iframe src="https://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;amp;id=21164602&amp;amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</description>
<dc:creator>EditorDavid</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2022-04-16T17:34:00+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:subject>crime</dc:subject>
<slash:department>I'll-be-seeing-you</slash:department>
<slash:section>yro</slash:section>
<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
<slash:hit_parade>56,56,49,40,14,2,0</slash:hit_parade>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://science.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/0453216/bill-gates-urges-investing-in-faster-development-for-life-saving-drugs?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">
<title>Bill Gates Urges Investing in Faster Development for Life-Saving Drugs</title>
<link>https://science.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/0453216/bill-gates-urges-investing-in-faster-development-for-life-saving-drugs?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed</link>
<description>The Covid-19 pandemic "would look very different if scientists had been able to develop a treatment sooner," writes Bill Gates, in a guest essay Friday in the New York Times. This ultimately would've reduced fatalities &amp;mdash; "and it may have been harder for myths and misinformation to spread the way they did." 

But note that Gates said "treatment" &amp;mdash; not vaccine. Gates believes most people in the public health community had expected an effective treatment would appear before vaccines became available.
Unfortunately, that's not what happened. Safe, effective Covid vaccines were available within a year &amp;mdash; a historic feat &amp;mdash; but treatments that could keep large numbers of people out of the hospital were surprisingly slow out of the gate.... 

In late 2021, a few of their efforts paid off &amp;mdash; not as soon as would have been ideal, but still in time to have a big impact. Merck and its partners developed an antiviral called molnupiravir, which was shown to significantly reduce the risk of hospitalization or death for people at high risk. Soon after, another oral antiviral, Paxlovid, made by Pfizer, also proved to be very effective, reducing the risk of severe illness or death by nearly 90 percent among high-risk, unvaccinated adults. These drugs are useful tools for combating the pandemic, but they arrived much later than they should have and, for many, they are still difficult to access.... 

It's a mistake to think of vaccines as the star of the show and therapeutics as the opening act you would just as soon skip. We're lucky that scientists made Covid vaccines as quickly as they did &amp;mdash; if they hadn't, the death toll would be far worse. But in the event of another pandemic, even if the world is able to develop a vaccine for a new pathogen in 100 days, it will still take a long time to get the vaccine to most of the population.... With good therapeutics, the risk of severe illness and death could drop significantly, and countries could decide to loosen restrictions on schools and businesses, reducing the disruption to education and the economy. What's more, imagine how people's lives would change if we're able to take the next step by linking testing and treatment. Anyone with early symptoms that might indicate Covid (or any other viral disease) could walk into a pharmacy or clinic anywhere in the world, get tested and, if positive for the virus, walk out with antivirals to take at home.... 

In short, although therapeutics didn't rescue us from Covid, they hold a lot of promise for saving lives and preventing future outbreaks from crippling health systems. But to make the most of that promise, the world needs to invest in the research and systems we'll need to find treatments much faster. That's why my foundation has supported a therapeutics accelerator at Duke University, but broader initiatives will be necessary to make lasting change. This will require substantial investment to bring together academia, industry and the latest software tools. But if we succeed, the next time the world faces an outbreak, we'll save millions more lives. 

Gates offers several specific recommendations &amp;mdash; including "investing in large libraries of drug compounds that researchers can quickly scan to see whether existing therapies work against new pathogens." And...

With advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning, it's now possible to use computers to identify weak spots on pathogens that we already know about, and we'll be able to do the same when new pathogens arise. These technologies are also speeding up the search for new compounds that will attack those weak spots.
With adequate funding, various groups could take the most promising new compounds through Phase 1 studies even before there's an epidemic, or at least have several leads that can be turned into a product quickly once we know what the target looks like.&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class="share_submission" style="position:relative;"&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Bill+Gates+Urges+Investing+in+Faster+Development+for+Life-Saving+Drugs%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F3vmsjgS"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fscience.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F22%2F04%2F16%2F0453216%2Fbill-gates-urges-investing-in-faster-development-for-life-saving-drugs%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"&gt;&lt;img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;



&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://science.slashdot.org/story/22/04/16/0453216/bill-gates-urges-investing-in-faster-development-for-life-saving-drugs?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed"&gt;Read more of this story&lt;/a&gt; at Slashdot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;iframe src="https://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;amp;id=21164706&amp;amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</description>
<dc:creator>EditorDavid</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2022-04-16T16:34:00+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:subject>medicine</dc:subject>
<slash:department>road-ahead</slash:department>
<slash:section>science</slash:section>
<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
<slash:hit_parade>50,48,43,39,13,6,3</slash:hit_parade>
</item>
<textinput rdf:about="https://slashdot.org/search.pl">
<title>Search Slashdot</title>
<description>Search Slashdot stories</description>
<name>query</name>
<link>https://slashdot.org/search.pl</link>
</textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
